Budget 2012 aims to stamp out property tax dodge of super-rich


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Budget 2012 aims to stamp out property tax dodge of super-rich” was written by Simon Goodley and Rupert Jones, for The Guardian on Wednesday 21st March 2012 19.03 UTC

The developers bill it as the most “exclusive address in the world”, where the globe’s super-rich can pay £85m for an apartment.

For that kind of price tag the residents of One Hyde Park, the Knightsbridge apartment block developed by Candy brothers Christian and Nick, gain access not just to lavish rooms, but also to a “21m stainless steel ozone swimming pool”, a “fully-equipped state-of-the-art gymnasium” and a “virtual games room with golf simulator”. The whole opulent package is meant to justify the development’s tag-line of “experience the exceptional”.

The rich and famous who bought one of these apartments faced something quite exceptional on Wednesday: a British Conservative chancellor aiming aggressive blows directly at them and their kin.

Starting on Thursday, the stamp duty paid on UK properties sold for more than £2m will rise to 7% from 5% – from £100,000 to £140,000 – George Osborne said in his budget speech. He then outlined how the Treasury would no longer tolerate a group of super-rich buyers who routinely dodge the charge by making their property purchase through an overseas company rather than in their own name.

“If you buy a property in Britain that is used for residential purposes, then we will expect stamp duty to be paid,” he said. “I will not hesitate to move swiftly without notice and retrospectively if inappropriate ways around these new rules are found.”

Osborne added: “A major source of abuse – and one that rouses the anger of many of our citizens – is the way some people avoid the stamp duty that the rest of the population pays, including by using companies to buy expensive residential property. I have given plenty of public warnings that this abuse should stop. Now I’m taking action. I am increasing the stamp duty land tax charge applied to residential properties over £2m brought into a corporate envelope. The charge will be 15%. And it will take effect today.”

A recent analysis of apartment owners in the super-luxe One Hyde Park development shows that 50 out of the 56 properties so far sold for a combined total of £1.1bn are owned by offshore companies. Half of those are based in the secretive British Virgin Islands, with six stationed in the Isle of Man and four in Guernsey.

The real owners therefore hide behind bland corporate names, but for the record you will find corporations such as Water Prop Holdings, a BVI company that has bought two apartments, for £86.2m and £50.24m, and is thought to be a front for the Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov.

Then there is Rose of Sharon 5 Ltd, part of a string of Isle of Man companies created by Barclays bank for a client believed to be Nigerian billionaire Folorunsho Alakija. That firm has spent £59.05m and £6.35m on a brace of flats, which come complete with their own wine cellars and a dining service provided by a nearby five-star hotel. And there is Mesinger Holdings Corp, a Belize-based entity that acquired a pad in the complex’s “Tower D” for £42.75m.

You will also find a Cayman Islands-based company called Park One, whose real owner is His Excellency Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani of Qatar. He just happens to be the financial backer of Project Grande (Guernsey) Ltd, the company set up as a joint venture with Candy & Candy to develop One Hyde Park.

The tax dodge, which is completely legal and is used by plenty of other ultra-wealthy investors, has proved effective because buying companies that own properties, rather than the properties themselves, attracted different tax rates.

When UK companies that owned properties were sold, they attracted a duty of 0.5% of the net assets – but the assets could effectively be brought down to zero by taking out a mortgage. If the property was held within an offshore company, there was no tax to pay regardless of the value of assets.

While stamp duty is paid by the purchaser, the seller implementing the schemes has still tended to gain as properties free of stamp duty tend to command higher prices. Tax experts also said that developers have wrapped yet-to-be-developed land into companies, meaning they pay rates on assets with lower values. Candy & Candy did not comment.

Paul Emery, PwC tax director, said: “The increase in the rate of stamp duty land tax to 7% on expensive residential properties is not altogether surprising, but the punitive charge of 15% on expensive residential properties transferred into companies is a clear sign that he is ‘throwing the book at avoidance’. Combined with a threat of retrospective legislation for avoidance, it is a strong signal that residential property sales cannot escape tax”.

He added: “The chancellor has stopped short of introducing the widely called for stamp tax on sales of companies already owning residential property, but the consultation on an annual property tax for high value residential property held by companies and a capital gains tax on off-shore companies may cause owners to think twice about their current ownership structure.” The new taxes will only apply to residential, not commercial properties.

Toby Ryland, a senior tax partner at accountants Blick Rothenberg, said the announcement that overseas companies that already own UK residential property worth more than £2m will be subject to capital gains tax from April 2013 was a retrospective tax charge. He added: “This can only make the UK less attractive to overseas investors.”

Some of the few identities of One Hyde Park purchasers that can be discovered directly from Land Registry records include Mohammed Saud Sultan al-Qasimi, head of finance for the government of Sharjah, one of the United Arab Emirates, who spent £11.5m on an apartment. Insurance entrepreneur Rory Carvill paid £21.2m on a property plus additional storage space.

Parking spaces have fetched a staggering £250,000, while three units of storage space sold for £150,000, £157,000 and £50,000.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Campaigners call for new homicide law for inciting suicide


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Campaigners call for new homicide law for inciting suicide” was written by Amelia Hill, for The Guardian on Monday 19th March 2012 15.46 UTC

Growing concerns about the failure of police to properly investigate cases of women who have killed themselves after violence or abuse have led to a campaign for a new homicide law of “suicide aggravated by harassment or violence”.

The campaign is to be launched next month by Southall Black Sisters, who say the law would also cover those who jump from high buildings after being jeered by onlookers or who kill themselves after being encouraged over the internet.

An estimated 10 women kill themselves every week after repeated abuse, Home Office statistics show. Attempted or successful suicide is more than three times higher among Asian women in the UK , especially among those aged between 15 and 24 years old, according to research published in the British Journal of Psychiatry in1992.

But prosecutions are rare: there is no law in Britain against encouraging suicide without physical help. Only coroner’s courts can compel investigations into suicides.

“At best, convoluted efforts are being made to hold perpetrators of violent or abusive conduct to account when a suicide results,” said Pragna Patel, a founding member of Southall Black Sisters, which has a history of forcing through new laws to protect women.

“At worst, such deaths are not properly investigated at all. In our experience, in the face of violence or abuse, many women feel that they have no option but to self-harm or kill themselves. This state of affairs is especially disturbing in the context of a complete absence of any … effective criminal prosecutions of perpetrators of abuse who are demonstrably culpable in causing a woman or vulnerable person to commit suicide.”

Patel launched the campaign after taking on the case of 23-year-old Nosheen Azam, who was found engulfed in flames in her garden in Sheffield in 2005.

Azam had come to the UK from Pakistan seven months earlier to live with her British husband, Amjid Hussein. Almost immediately, she began complaining to her family that she was being abused by some of her husband’s family, said Azam’s father Mohammed. On the day she was found in flames, she had told her parents that she was frightened for her life, her father said. Nobody knows whether someone tried to murder Azam, whether she was goaded into taking her own life, or whether she made her own decision: the young woman now lies in a hospital bed, brain-dead with over 60% burns. She is, said her father, “a living corpse”.

“There has been no concerted effort to find out what drove Nosheen to attempt to take her own life,” said Patel. “If she had died, there would at least have been an inquest. Because there is no law of ‘suicide aggravated by domestic violence’, however, there is no motivation for the police to investigate whether it is a case of provable encouragement to suicide, despite that being nearly the same thing as murder.”

A new homicide law could have wider applications in cases like that of Fiona Pilkington, who killed herself and her disabled daughter after repeated abuse by youths near their home in Hinckley, Leicestershire.

It could be used in cases like that of Shaun Dykes, the 17-year-old boy who jumped off a shopping centre in Derby in 2008 after being goaded by onlookers. Film footage appeared on YouTube.

Patel criticised the legal options available when a woman kills herself after enduring domestic violence. It is up to campaigners to ask coroner’s courts to investigate why the suicide occurred. This, she said, is inadequate and “has enormous cost implications for campaigning groups like ours”.

“There has to be some means of ensuring that those responsible for causing someone to take their life, are held criminally liable. The current state of affairs in untenable and cannot therefore be justified,” she said. Patel wants the law to encompass mental damage. “If domestic violence or abuse results in psychological harm … there is no basis upon which to bring a criminal prosecution under the present law on manslaughter.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Land Registry Form RQ

HMLR offers additional protection for rental property owners

The Land Registry has introduced a new form “Request for a restriction by owner(s) not living at the property” as an additional security measure aimed at owners who do not live at the registered property.  This will initially be trialled for six months.

Under this measure property owners can make a request using a specific Land Registry form, asking the Registrar to enter a restriction.  The form enables a property owner to make a request for a restriction to be placed in the register of the title to the property.

Owner occupiers who do not qualify to request a restriction in this way can still apply for restriction in their register but have to apply using a different form.

Land Registry has created a special restriction for those who believe they may be at risk. This restriction makes sure that they will not register a sale or a mortgage, unless a solicitor or other conveyancer has certified that the person who has signed the deed is the registered owner. This could help to prevent a fraudster forging a signature.

The wording of a restriction is very important and you should seek legal advice if you wish to protect your property in this way.

For more detail about the process, and to understand what a restriction means, please contact WilliamMarriott@meadowsfraser.com

 

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Stamp Duty evasion warning to legal profession

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has urged the legal profession to think twice before becoming involved in Stamp Duty Land Tax schemes (SDLT Schemes).

The schemes look to take advantage of perceived loopholes in tax laws so buyers reduce or negate their charge to paying stamp duty Land Tax. The SRA is concerned about schemes involving residential properties and has warned the profession to make sure any involvement it has with SDLT schemes complies with the Solicitors Code of Conduct.

HMRC has warned it is actively challenging property sale transactions that have been artificially structured to avoid paying the correct stamp duty. It added that very few SDLT Schemes are successful in providing the savings their promoters claim.

If HMRC successfully challenges a scheme, buyers could be liable to pay all of the stamp duty land tax, plus interest and a penalty. Solicitors could also face punishment, as if they knowingly provided information in support of a tax return that is incorrect, HMRC could impose a penalty of £3,000 per submission.

Richard Collins, SRA Executive Director, said: “In view of the level of concern on the part of HMRC and the fundamental importance of integrity in the provision of legal advice, we will look very closely at the conduct of any firm actively involved in these schemes. Buyers of property are free to use honest and proper tax planning to mitigate their tax liability, but there are a number of risks and misconceptions surrounding SDLT schemes.

“Given this, we would urge any solicitor involved or considering becoming involved in the implementation or promotion of a scheme to make sure they comply with the Code of Conduct. This includes acting with integrity, independence, in the best interests of the client, and behaving in a way that maintains the trust the public places in them and the provision of legal services.

“Involvement in SDLT schemes could put a solicitor at risk of failing to uphold any if not all of these Principles.”

David Gauke MP, The Exchequer Secretary, added: “I welcome the work that the SRA is undertaking to ensure solicitors are not abusing their positions of trust, and their obligations to all their clients when advising on and conveyancing property. HMRC is investigating schemes notified to it and also tracking down other users of schemes to challenge apparent deficiencies in returns submitted.

“HMRC will seek payment of the full amount of SDLT in all such appropriate cases.”

While the SRA’s particular current concern is schemes involving residential properties, those considering schemes involving any type of property might also want to look at the issue carefully.

The Warning Note is set out in full here:

http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct/guidance/warning-notices/stamp-duty-land-tax-schemes–warning-notice.page

This article appeared on www.sra.org.uk on 16th of Feb 2012.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Return to Sender

Technological advances have fundamentally changed the way we do business. This is most noticeable in the way that we communicate, with electronic communication tools, such as e-mails, becoming the norm in day-to-day business interactions. Andrew Todd, real estate litigation specialist at national law firm, DWF, explains how case law is potentially changing the legal standing of electronic communications, and provides some practical tips to help people avoid unwittingly binding themselves contractually via email communications.

However, when negotiating contracts, especially in terms of property, it is important to remember that while e-mail exchanges may be viewed as a way to iron out and informally discuss the terms and conditions of an eventual contract, there is a potential that they could have legal implications for the senders.

Increasingly, case law is pointing towards a situation where a set of emails could constitute a legally binding property contract – one which a person may have had no intention of actually agreeing to. The key for those involved in contractual discussions is to be careful as to what they say, or commit, to via email, and, ultimately, to avoid binding themselves at any point before they fully intend to.

The legal landscape

The main legislation setting down the necessary conditions for the creation of a land contract is Section 2 of the Law Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. It sets out that, to be enforceable, a contract must incorporate all the terms agreed by the parties, be signed by all the parties involved, and be in writing.

The legislation was intended to minimise fraud and prevent any parties from entering into a contract on uncertain terms – but was written before the use of emails became widespread. In practice, therefore, judges have had to interpret how electronic communications translate into the terms set out by Section 2.

The recent case of the High Court in Green v Ireland [2011] has highlighted that  the Courts may, if the facts are proven, find that emails have created a binding land contract.

Mrs Ireland had a legal charge (entered into in December 2008) over a property belonging to a company part-owned by her sister. She had loaned the company £300,000 towards the property’s acquisition; however, when the company went in to liquidation in 2009, the liquidator claimed that the charge was a preference, and should be set aside. Mrs Ireland claimed that she already had an entitlement to the charge, based on an agreement contained in an exchange of emails in October 2007 between her and her sister, when the company was solvent.

The Court found that the charge was a preference.  Mrs Ireland could not demonstrate the existence of a contract in the emails because they did not refer to all the etrms that ahd been agreed orally and they did not point to binding obligations.  Mrs Ireland and her sister had verbally agreed to a loan of £300,000, at a rate of 15 per cent, and repayable over six monthly intervals. However, in terms of electronic communications, her sister had simply emailed asking for part of the loan, £145,000, to be transferred to the company’s account, and promised to arrange a charge over the property, in Mrs Ireland’s favour. In reply, Mrs Ireland emailed: “Do remind me tomorrow. Any news on the cooker?”

With no reference to the repayment dates or interest rates, or indeed the full £300,000 figure, the court concluded that the emails did not contain all the conditions, as required by Section 2, to be a binding contract.

However, the judge did go on to consider whether, under Section 2, the emails met other conditions necessary to be considered a binding land contract. In terms of the condition that a contract must be signed by both parties, he agreed that by typing their first names to sign off their respective emails, the sisters had “signed” the emails, in accordance with Section 2.

Furthermore, he concluded that an email and its reply, when taken together, could constitute a single document for the purposes of Section 2, when the second email is sent as a direct reply to the initial email.

The decision that the sisters had “signed” the emails, in particular, has caused some debate. In a previous case, Pereira Fernandez SA v Metha [2006], the High Court declared if a party sends an electronically created document, then the sender could be treated as having signed it if they have inserted their name in the email.

However, in the Pereira case, the Judge found that the appearance of the name of the sender in an email did not amount to a signature, if it had been automatically generated by an internet service provider as the email was sent. Nevertheless, the Judge’s observations in relation to the potential for the appearance of a deliberately inserted name to authenticate the contents of an email set an interesting reference point for similar cases, such as Green v Ireland.

Lessons from case law

Following on from these important cases, there is now greater clarification as to how emails should be legally treated in the case of contract disagreements. With this in mind, I would advise parties involved in real estate contract negotiations to take a few steps to safeguard themselves.

When drafting an email that contains matters which could arguably be considered the terms of a contract, avoid inserting your name when signing off. Similarly, when replying to an email that is part of the negotiation process, do not deliberately insert a “signature”.

Even the insertion of a first name could be sufficient to authenticate a whole document. Instead, use an automated signature to sign off an email containing sensitive information.

Furthermore, do not create chains of emails when discussing important business matters. The Green v Ireland case shows that chain of continuous emails discussing the same topic could legally constitute a single document. Even if only the initial emails are signed, a court could still find that, over the course of the discussion, all the terms of a contract were mentioned and agreed to. It is advisable to start new emails when responding to negotiation emails.

Finally and critically, label all sensitive emails dealing with contract negations as “strictly subject to contract”. The judiciary has so far tended to be highly reluctant to dispel this important proviso, regardless of the contents of an email chain.

Final remarks

The judiciary is, arguably, still some way off finding that an email satisfies the conditions of Section 2.  However, these recent cases have shown that judges are becoming ever more ready to consider that an email could constitute a binding document, should all the requirements be in place.

That said, the Electronic Communications Act 2000 shows that the legislator has been keen to facilitate electronic conveyancing for some time. The Land Registry has presently shelved plans for electronic conveyancing and the judiciary will continue to be forced to interpret out-dated legislation to deal with complex cases involving electronic communications. The key for those involved in property negotiations is to use the same caution in electronic communications as they would when dealing with a written document, “subject to contract” remains a good starting point for demonstrating a lack of immediate contractual intention.

This article written by Andrew Todd featured in Estates Gazette on the 28th of February 2012

Posted in Legal News | Leave a comment

Community sentences to get tougher under David Cameron plan


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Community sentences to get tougher under David Cameron plan” was written by David Batty, for The Guardian on Friday 24th February 2012 01.08 UTC

David Cameron wants to toughen up non-custodial community sentences with new sanctions including giving courts the power to confiscate offenders’ credit cards, passports and driving licences.

In a bid to curb impressions that community sentences are a soft alternative to prison, the prime minister is also proposing to electronically tag offenders and prevent them from leaving home for most of the day.

No 10′s proposals to toughen up the legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders bill were made during negotiations with the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke.

The bill already includes plans to curfew offenders serving community sentences for 16 hours a day, with the threat of being taken back to court if they break the terms of their house arrest.

The ministry wants to publish the proposals within the next six weeks, although no final agreement has been reached.

A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said: “We want to reform community sentences to ensure that offenders are properly punished for their crimes and effectively rehabilitated and we are still considering a variety of options. We will publish a consultation setting out our proposals in due course.”

As the prisons reach capacity levels, the prime minister is looking to strengthen public opinion over non-custodial sentences. In December, the National Offender Management Service (Noms) said that one in four offenders who had been given community sentences or released from prison early on licence then failed to comply with the terms set by the authorities. Noms found that 198,725 orders and licences came to an end in 2010-11, but only 150,632 were completed successfully.

The new legal aid bill is supposed to save the government £350m-450m a year, but analysis by King’s College London found that savings from restricting the availability of legal aid would be significantly less than half of that predicted.

The government has abandoned a clause that would have given police officers the power to subject suspects in police stations to means testing before they could see a lawyer.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Father calls for domestic violence law change


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Father calls for domestic violence law change” was written by Helen Carter, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 20th February 2012 17.00 UTC

A man whose daughter was murdered by her violent boyfriend has handed in a petition at Downing Street calling for a change in the law to protect women from domestic abuse.

Michael Brown, from Batley, West Yorkshire, travelled to London as part of a campaign to introduce “Clare’s Law” named after his daughter, Clare Wood, who was killed by her boyfriend in February 2009.

The law would allow women to find out if their boyfriends or husbands had a previous history of domestic violence.

Clare Wood met her boyfriend, George Appleton, on Facebook, unaware of his long history of violence against women, including repeated harrassment, threats and kidnapping one of his former girlfriends at knifepoint.

He strangled Clare Wood and set her on fire before going on the run, before taking his own life.

At an inquest into her death, which was held last year, coroner Jennifer Leeming said women in abusive relationships has a right to know about the violent past of the men they were with. A verdict of unlawfull killing by strangulation was recorded as the cause of her death.

The coroner said she would report back to the government recommending that people at risk of harm should be given information about their partners’ past so they can make an informed choice.

Clare Wood had complained to Greater Manchester Police on a number of occasions about the campaign of harassment from her former partner. The Independent Police Complaints Commission ruled she had been badly let down by Greater Manchester Police.

The force says it has now introduced a number of changes to policy and procedures in the handling of domestic violence cases.

Brown, who is supported by the Salford MP Hazel Blears and Manchester radio station Key 103, is calling on the government to introduce Clare’s Law to help women.

The former prison officer handed over the petition on Monday that has around 1,000 signatures calling for a change in the law.

He said: “I have been campaigning for the last six months and have been pleasantly surprised at the public reaction to the proposed change in the law.

“The interest world-wide is also unbelievable, from America to Australia, to an article in a newspaper in Pravda. The world is watching for a lead from the UK’s government, the cradle of democracy, and I pray that they make the right decision.”

In 2011, the home secretary, Theresa May, agreed to open a ‘Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme’ to public consultation and is now considering the response.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Camden council launches legal challenge to HS2


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Camden council launches legal challenge to HS2″ was written by Gwyn Topham, transport correspondent, for The Guardian on Thursday 16th February 2012 00.01 UTC

The “great earthquake” that “rent the whole neighbourhood” was recorded by Charles Dickens in Dombey and Son when a railway first cut through Camden in the early 19th century. Nearly 200 years on, Camden’s residents are stepping up their fight against what they fear will be a smaller, but similar, seismic shock from High Speed 2, the rail scheme given the go-ahead last month.

Camden council on Thursday signalled the start of legal action against the government, joining rural anti-HS2 campaigners seeking a judicial review. The first section of the £33bn project’s route from London to Birmingham will demolish much of an estate housing many hundreds of people near Euston station.

While much protest has focused on the scheme’s effect on the Chilterns in marginal Tory-held constituencies, more than two-thirds of the 323 homes earmarked for demolition along the entire route are within the first half-mile in central London, mostly social housing on the Regent’s Park estate. Camden council believes a further 264 homes near the proposed line are at risk.

The redevelopment and expansion of Euston will affect businesses in adjoining streets. Plans show Drummond Street, site of the first Patak’s store in the 1950s and a historic home of British curry, will be partially knocked down and restaurateurs in the renowned stretch of curry houses say they face a huge loss of trade.

Camden council on Thursday served a formal “letter before claim” on the transport secretary, Justine Greening, identifying legal flaws in the government’s decision to proceed with HS2.

Councillor Sarah Hayward, who has already petitioned Greening directly, said she was bitterly disappointed by the government’s response to their concerns about the “catastrophic mistake” of HS2. She said: “We are talking about people’s homes and businesses. The government’s approach is flawed and we will fight this decision brick by brick if we have to.”

Camden says the government has given no guarantees of upfront funds to mitigate the loss of housing, businesses, parkland and community facilities.

Frank Dobson, the Labour MP for Holborn and St Pancras, said: “The new footprint of Euston isn’t just a little extension, but the size of a new St Pancras International again. We’ve got no guarantees whatever for the people who live there about rehousing people locally, or security, or rent. The right-to-buy leaseholders are the worst off: they certainly won’t be able to buy somewhere equivalent.”

Work to deepen cuttings dug for Robert Stephenson’s original Victorian railway will also affect the more affluent areas around Regent’s Park and Camden Lock. “Even just during the process there’s going to be the most devastating amount of noise and nuisance and disruption for pedestrians and traffic,” he said.

Stan Passmore, 85, has been living in his local authority flat overlooking the railway since 1961. The veteran of the Royal Navy’s Arctic convoys to Russia in the second world war said: “If people knew what was going to happen they could come to terms with it, make plans. But I’ve got neighbours suffering from clinical depression, crying at the thought of being turfed out. The whole business of moving terrifies them. You can’t explain what moving means to a young person. This place is full of memories – my [deceased] wife, my children.”

Azad Ali’s family have lived in the neighbouring block for 35 years – since he was five years old. Three generations now live there: his parents, who bought their flat, are pensioners now, while his children go to the same schools as he did. Even if they were adequately compensated – unlikely, according to Dobson – he says it is beside the point. “No one wants to move. It’s a close-knit community. They had all that hoo-haa about the Chilterns over people who are going to lose their views. Here it’s homes and livelihoods.”

The Department for Transport said: “Rebuilding Euston will inevitably cause significant disruption but we are committed to working closely with Camden and the GLA [Greater London Authority] with the intention of agreeing a joint strategy for the Euston area and providing new social housing to replace any that is compulsorily purchased. This will also include engagement with local people, businesses and community representatives.”Earlier this week the HS2 Action Alliance, an umbrella organisation for 70 environmental and residents’ action groups nationwide, served notice it would be seeking a judicial review, claiming that HS2 would not comply with EU environmental protection directives. Last week the 51m group, an alliance of 18 mainly Conservative councils led by Buckinghamshire county council, announced similar legal action.

Should the HS2 project secure expected parliamentary approval next year, high-speed trains are scheduled to start running in 2026 between London and Birmingham, with extensions to Manchester and Leeds in 2032. The trains will almost halve journey times between major cities, but supporters say the critical point is that a new line is essential to meet future passenger demand.

Camden has held a succession of public meetings which residents have attended – but, said Ali, “the people from HS2 never turn up”. If the legal action doesn’t get their attention, he said, they will have to do something more dramatic at Euston. “We need to chain Frank Dobson to the railings.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Meadows Fraser sponsoring St George’s Hill Lawn Tennis Club juniors

Meadows Fraser Solicitors are delighted to announce their agreement to sponsor the junior tennis section of St George’s Hill Lawn Tennis Club, the prestigious private members’ club in Weybridge, Surrey.

The sponsorship agreement will cover all aspects of the junior tennis section, including sponsorship of the junior courts, primary sponsorship to the Club’s Open and Closed annual junior tournaments and the regular training sessions conducted by the Club.

Piers Meadows, Managing Partner of Meadows Fraser, comments:-

“We are very happy to be associated with St George’s Hill Tennis Club, with its rich history and strong links to the local community.  We are particularly pleased to be involved with the juniors, who represent the future of the Club.  We feel that this agreement will be of great benefit to both parties.”

Miles Hill, Club Manager of St. George’s Hill Lawn Tennis Club, says:-

“We at the Club are delighted to have reached this agreement with Meadows Fraser Solicitors.  The juniors are a very important part of St George’s Hill Tennis Club and Meadows Fraser’s sponsorship will help to strengthen this section, where we have some very talented players coming through.  The Club is especially happy with the agreement given that both Peter and Piers Meadows are longstanding members of the Club.”

For further details of Meadows Fraser LLP, please contact Piers Meadows as piersmeadows@meadowsfraser.com or on 01932 852 057.

If you would like further information on St. George’s Hill Lawn Tennis Club, please make contact with Miles Hill at milesh@stghltc.co.uk or on 01932 843 541.

Posted in Practice News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Retired police officer wins injury pension ruling


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Retired police officer wins injury pension ruling” was written by Owen Bowcott, legal affairs correspondent, for The Guardian on Monday 6th February 2012 12.40 UTC

Police authorities may have to find tens of millions of pounds extra to fund their pension liabilities after a retired inspector won a landmark legal challenge preserving his income.

The ruling by a court in Leeds overturns Home Office guidance that permitted a review of the pensions of injured officers once they reach retirement age and resulted in lower payments.

One estimate suggested it could add £80m to police authorities’ bills. A high proportion of police authorities had accepted the guidance.

The test case was brought by Edward Crudace, 67, who served with Northumbria police. He was seriously injured when arresting a prisoner and was forced to retire from the force.

His injuries meant he could not work and he was awarded a substantial injury pension. When he reached the age of 65, however, it was cut by Northumbria police, relying on the Home Office guidance, leaving Crudace with a severely reduced income.

David Lock QC of No5 Chambers, who represented Crudace, argued that the Home Office guidance was unlawful because it led to police injury pensions routinely being reduced to the lowest level when former officers reached the age of 65.

In a high court ruling in Leeds, Judge Behrens reversed the cuts to Crudace’s pension and ruled that the Home Office guidance was unlawful because it was inconsistent with the statutory scheme under which the pensions were paid.

The judgment, he acknowledged, would enable other former police officers who had had their pensions reduced in a similar way to apply to police authorities for the decisions to be reversed and for their pensions to be restored.

Crudace’s solicitor, Ron Thompson, of the law firm Lake Jackson, said: “This judgment opens the door for thousands of injured police officers who have had their pensions reduced unlawfully to apply to have the decision reversed. When the decision is reviewed they will be entitled to a pension at its proper level and, in many cases, to a substantial backpayment.

“The right thing for police authorities to do now is to identify every former injured police officer whose pension has been wrongly reduced, and to agree to review each one. I hope that the Home Office recognises that the fault for this misconceived guidance lies with officials at the Home Office rather than individual police forces. The cost of putting this debacle right ought to be met by the Home Office and not individual police forces.”

Crudace said: “I always knew that my pension had been wrongly reduced but Northumbria Police Authority refused to accept this, and have wasted thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money attempting to defend an unlawful decision.

“I know there are many former police officers who have been injured serving their communities in the same position as me. I hope they will be able to use this landmark decision to get their pensions restored to the level they are entitled to.”

The Home Office declined to comment. A spokesperson for Northumbria Police Authority said: “[We] and Northumbria police, along with a number of other authorities and forces, implemented Home Office guidance concerning the granting of injury awards in addition to pensions. The guidance stated that once a retired officer reached state pension age then the force could review their injury award. Following judicial review proceedings the high court has ruled that the guidance is wrong in law.

“Northumbria Police Authority and the force have a duty to ensure the most effective use of public money and acted in good faith when following this guidance. We now welcome the clarity provided on this issue by the high court. As a matter of urgency we will be reviewing all the decisions made in light of this judgment and will be contacting anyone affected personally.

“We also recognise the valuable contribution all our retired officers have given to the community and this in no way should be underestimated.”

Mike Barker, the deputy chief executive and solicitor of Northumbria Police Authority, said: “We are still assessing all of the implications of the ruling at this stage and are looking at the impact this may have on the budget.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment